JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)September 25, 2019

A- de 2019

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

✓Claimant Procurador General De La Nacion

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimento Del Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Causal consistente en tener interés en la decisión
  • Improcedencia
Impedimento En Proceso De Constitucionalidad
  • Causales de magistrados y conjueces son aplicables al Procurador General de la Nación
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

El Procurador General de la Nación manifestó su impedimento para conceptuar en el proceso de la referencia, al considerar que se encontraba incurso en la causal relativa a tener interés directo en la materia.

Luego de verificar que en el presente caso no concurre un interés directo, personal y especial del Jefe del Ministerio Público en el resultado del presente proceso de constitucional, la Sala Plena de la Corporación decidió NEGAR la solicitud invocada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. NEGAR la solicitud de impedimento formulada por el señor Procurador General de la Nación para rendir el concepto previsto en el artículo 242-2 de la Constitución y respecto de la demanda contenida en el expediente D-13281.
  2. SEGUNDO. COMUNICAR esta decisión al señor Procurador General de la Nación, con el fin de que ejerza la competencia prevista en la citada norma constitucional.
  3. Comuníquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.